608
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

My concern are the sanctions, which don’t accomplish their goals, and disproportionately affects the people of Iran. It is an exercise in power, to demonstrate power, and is condemned by the world.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

So for our thought experiment now, YOU'RE the one writing the rules: What rule (besides sanctions) would YOU put in place to accomplish the goals without disproportionately affecting the people of Iran?

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We have an organization for this, the United Nations. They condemn the sanctions. Follow the UN. A rule: The Golden Rule. Don’t do anything to another country that you wouldn’t want done to you.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

We have an organization for this, the United Nations. They condemn the sanctions.

I've seen no sources say that. Back up your statement with a real source that says that.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

First, thank you for posting that. Second, you should be seeing the problem with it. Its not the UN, as a governing body, saying that.

From your source:

" the group of Special Rapporteurs and the Independent Expert on international solidarity, said in a statement."

This is a group of people hired by the HRC, not even a binding UN resolution either. The HRC is following its mandate to: "strengthening the promotion and protection of human rights ". They call out the results of actions, without addressing the reasons or actions to solutions to why those actions were taken. They're not wrong, but their statements are incomplete. Its okay for them though, its not their mandate to come up with solutions, just to call out problems.

Where is the UN's enforcement answer to curtailing Iran's nuclear weapons program? This is hard and confusing world or geopolitics.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The UN still sanctions their nuclear ambitions. Which I agree with, because it’s the UN. America is unilaterally doing the economic sanctions, which they do not agree with. It would be difficult for the UN to vote to condemn the US due to the structure of the organization (US led). So they have to do it with press releases. They did vote on the Cuban embargo and blockade. And every member country except the US and Israel voted to end it.

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
608 points (96.6% liked)

World News

39033 readers
1150 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS