this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
1133 points (97.5% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

2126 readers
1308 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

You have to eat food to eat. That’s it.

...and that food has to come from somewhere. Someone has to work so you can eat.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Surprise, it comes out of the fucking ground! Of course if you want to eat something that is not native to your region it's a whole thing with exploitation and whatnot. I just find the disconnection with nature/life jarring

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Food doesn't simply erupt out of the ground on its own, not in quantities necessary to feed any kind of significant population. Farmers do in fact have to do labor to produce crops.

The bit about food not simply erupting from the ground on its own in quantities sufficient to feed a significant population goes double for cities where you have lots more people and lots less growing land.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Of course that was hyperbole. I am not saying that growing food is effortless or easy. I'm just saying that food is natural (duh), while coerced farmers aren't natural, but rather a product of capitalism allowing you to buy any kind of food known to man, fresh, in a huge supermarket, and throw it away if it is not sold. Or any another authoritarian system for that matter, it would just happen in different ways. As my other comments show, I'm talking about different scales. Cities provided an advantage not long ago in many ways - infrastructure, culture, economy, opportunities etc -, but as modern technology shortened distances, I feel less and less people can find a compelling reason to live surrounded by miles and miles of cement and smog. High-density and high-volume communities/housing are two different things.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago

You started with a rejection of "you have to work if you want to eat", my whole point was someone has to work if you want to eat, and if that someone isn't you they probably need some kind of incentive for why they are working so you can eat.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)