49
Youtubers are running out of ideas, so they're mining 1970s psychology journals for content
(hexbear.net)
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
49 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
671 readers
503 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If it wasn't overproduced to shit and was just normal, I'd imagine there's lots of interesting stuff in 1970s psych journals.
They had the same ethical guidelines as youtubers today. Interesting? Sure. Scientifically useful? Probably not. Psychopathic? Absolutely.
animal abuse
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pit_of_despairWhaaaat the fuck. Common Madison L. (Jokes aside) that’s all so fucked - dude needed therapy and instead was paid to abuse monkeys
:what-the-hell: do not click that, you think you can stomach carnist depravity but like no
don't think you're unique don't read it it's really fucked up