this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
74 points (98.7% liked)
Politics
10906 readers
17 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Dowd was also making jokes about it, saying that maybe it was just one of Charlie Kirk's fan firing off his own gun in celebration. Lots of people in the media have been pointing out that Charlie Kirk was a massive piece of shit who specifically was unsympathetic about other people getting shot, that is probably still fine (for now I guess).
And yes, the right has been "joking" about left wing people getting murdered for years. That doesn't mean that adopting their psychopathic traits in turn is the right way to move things forward.
But again, most people facing the dangers are regular people.
His joke was also made at a time when literally nothing was known about the shooter and really wasn't all that offensive or psychopathic.
Making a joke that someone fired some celebratory shots when he didn't know Kirk had been hit and targeted is... are we really offended by this?
Oh, that's wild. I didn't know that part of it. That's... I mean, that changes things. It's also a little weird though. How would he have heard that there were gunshots at the Charlie Kirk event but not heard that they hit Charlie Kirk? That doesn't make any sense to me.
Information doesn't flow through a system at an equal, steady rate. 🤷🏻♂️
"I better let this newscaster know that someone shot a gun at the Charlie Kirk rally, that's important and he's about to talk about it on TV. No need to let him know that Charlie Kirk got shot in the neck when it happened though. That part can come later."
You know people talk about things before all the information rolls in, right?
Like... its possible he talked about it before anyone knew Kirk was hit.
Before anyone knew? That is definitely not true.
Here's the video:
https://x.com/TheDeskDotNet/status/1965939360592965736
I kind of wish there was more of the lead-up to it, but that's easily enough context to see that they knew he'd been shot. I do sort of get the point he was trying to get at, but the way he said it was clearly a horrifying joke, you can sort of see the anchor's shock as she's saying right after that it is confirmed that Kirk was shot (i.e. there is no uncertainty, just in case anyone wasn't clear). The chyron says he was shot. Dowd immediately transitions to talking about "hateful deeds" right after.