this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
432 points (98.4% liked)

Just Post

1110 readers
14 users here now

Just post something ๐Ÿ’›

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Shouldn't a CDMA phone have caused the issue continuously then? They have a constance radio broadcast

[โ€“] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

GSM and CDMA don't really work that much differently. Neither has a constant-on radio, they register with a tower and then periodically check for a tower.

The main difference is one uses TDMA (GSM) and the other users CDMA for voice calls. (Time Division Multiplexing vs Carrier Division Multiplexing).

Text messaging is a side-effect of CDMA packet framing - it had to be tacked-on to GSM since it didn't utilize the same connection design.

[โ€“] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah I shouldn't have said constant I had that thought wrong. I guess it is better worded as continuosly syncratic rather than time based. I guess I was thinking the regular check-in would have caused the magnetic interference every time instead of just when the connection was amplified.

I thought TDMA would have died with 2g though. We have so many devices now I would think it would be impossible to have time slots for check ins. Sounds like something fun to look into but unfortunately I doubt I'll ever have time to play with that.

Always something new

[โ€“] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 1 points 4 days ago

I don't think it uses time slots for check-in, just for the voice call part. Especially since a phone changing towers wouldn't know what time slot was available.

I assume the interference is caused by a phone increasing it's power output to establish a voice call, which requires much more power than a data keep-alive/get messages connection.

It's been a long time since I did a deep dive though.