this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
561 points (94.9% liked)

People Twitter

8190 readers
1343 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What's the Source: ?

I wanna share it with others who still believe it's true

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 35 points 6 days ago (2 children)

On September 11, 2025, The Wall Street Journal issued a caution regarding its earlier report on an internal law-enforcement bulletin concerning the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk. The bulletin had mentioned ammunition found near the scene with “transgender and anti-fascist ideology” engravings, but the Justice Department indicated the report might not accurately reflect the messages on the ammunition as the probe was in its early stages.

This is statement from the WSJ

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So they walked back their own claim, good good good.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

They're walking back a claim that was so stupid that it could only be made up by a conspiracy theory idiot.

Yet they made it. Top notch US journalism here people

Now they're somewhat walking it back but that doesn't matter, that walking back part will be ignored, the damage has been done

Yup, it was said, now it is truth to a lot of people

[–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Probably the person making the more believable claim.