this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
42 points (97.7% liked)
politics
22836 readers
223 users here now
Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.
Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.
Take any slop posts to the slop trough
Main is good for shitposting.
Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.
Off topic posts will be removed.
Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I would suggest best boy peter gelderloos (https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/peter-gelderloos-the-failure-of-nonviolence - for overview of recent political stuff from 80s-2010s from very anarchist blackpilled (😉) position) and best girl zoe (https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/zoe-baker-means-and-ends - more malatesta sunshine view). You can read malatesta and bakunin, but their beefs are more irrelevant in today world.
i think reading along you would get perfectly good idea about anarchism/ancom thingy (at least ones i find relevant, anarchists have some stuff with egoism, but i find it rather disturbing ideology)
For more ml-friendly style - redsails has lot of interesting small essays (like https://redsails.org/masses-elites-and-rebels/ or https://redsails.org/really-existing-fascism/). You can read state and revolution ofc, for general thingy (but rather idealized). Imperialism in 21th century by john smith for more world spanning tale of shit as it is now. perry anderson for historic books to sort of see how historical materialism sees the world.
marxism is more complicated cause they are more popular, council comms will read pannekoek and brain of the firm, ml will split on stalin/trotsky and then blame each other, dengists doing god knows what to explain their shit.
You have a lense (historical materialism - position that society (laws/customs/state) is structured around existing production and distribution, being a structure on top of it. Not ideas (e.g. you can rail about liberty all you want, ancient greece would still enslave your ass cause they need you to mine marble) changing society, but rather some objective things in material exchange breaking down during transitions), and what to do about that (intentionally breaking them down from below/above, reforming blah blah is where lots of marxists split), and how to go about it (electoralism, adventurism, intentional abstention and communizing etc). (anarchists frequently accept the lens of criticism, not so much the how and to which end to go about it, see means and ends)
Really appreciate you taking the time to write this all out, thanks a bunch 🕺