this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
80 points (98.8% liked)

electoralism

22170 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
context@hexbear.net
gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net
80
Zohran Mamdani: A Rabbi Explained To Me Why "Globalize The Intifada" Makes Her Think Of Bombings (www.realclearpolitics.com)
submitted 3 days ago by smokeppb@hexbear.net to c/electoralism@hexbear.net
83 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This backpedal comes right after meeting with AOC and Bernie Sanders. The two have rubbed their shitlib off on him. Previously he seemed to not be totally for or against (could have generously been seen as "hiding his power level") but now clearly against the phrase.

I still hope Zohran wins though. Him losing would be a big win for the pieces of shit in the media and in power looking to prove that even suggesting Israel might be doing something wrong is forbidden.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maturin@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Zohran and his backpedalling (and it is perceived as backpedalling, thats what matters in political campaigns) on radical rhetoric that he has himself used in the past

This is incorrect and it is the second time you have said it in this thread after being presented evidence that it is incorrect. It is consistent with what he said months ago and it is not "rhetoric that he has himself used in the past" as the article I pasted above clearly says.

So, yes, you are shit stirring by trying to create a need for all this conflict in this thread based on false premises that you then double down on and get all defensive about. How are we supposed to have a "healthy discussion" based on your false premise?

[–] smokeppb@hexbear.net 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And you lied multiple times saying there is nothing to discuss here, despite many other threads suggesting otherwise. I think it's time you and I "disengage" as they say.

[–] Maturin@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago

and you lied multiple times

Also false. "Disengage" has to be stand-alone, not at the end of a rant full of your own false statement. So here, you can disengage as you smoke this PIGPOOPBALLS