this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
13 points (62.7% liked)

World News

40136 readers
916 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You must also remember that they're running out of ice. The new shipments from Thailand are being delayed by jaguar attacks.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -5 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 7 months ago

That's not gas. That's liquid fuel.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

'Gasoline' means petrol, not gas.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

No shit...

Oil refiners make lots of products, gas, diesel, kerosene (aviation gas)

No refineries, none of these products, no vehicles to move troops no more war.

Also no income to fund said war.

Dumbass

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago

If that was the way to win the war then Russia would've have won a long time ago because they've been attacking Ukrainian refineries all this time on a much bigger scale. The only dumbass in this conversation is the one who evidently hasn't considered this obvious fact.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No, the distinction is important. Russia mostly extracts petroleum and gas, and exports them. The processing happens in China or India. Then, the processed components, including petrol (gasoline), are resold by China and India.

Now I'm sure Russia would rather their refineries not be attacked, and these disruptions could very well cause local shortages or price fluctuations. But for the wider economy or overall supply chains, this won't matter much.