this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2025
79 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8464 readers
301 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If no new species can evolve, but (as not even creationists dispute) species can go extinct, then the extinction of species over time causes biodiversity to inexorably trend toward zero.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

Because god has to be perfect for whatever reason.

Monotheism doesn't really work without the proposition that the one god is perfect. At least not from any kind of ontological framework that I'm aware of. This is a simplification because I don't remember my Acquinas super well, but I think it more or less goes:

If there are good things in the world, and good things come from God, then God must be that which is good, and the bad things are the things that are distinct of and away from God.

If God was not perfect, then God wouldn't be whole (because there would be good things that are not of God). If God isn't whole, then not all good things could come from God, and there isn't anywhere else they could come from (no other gods they could come from, this is monotheism), then they couldn't exist.

Of course, with the way I framed it you could poke a serious hole by asking "wait but if only the good things come from God then why are there bad things" to which I say "there's not really any substance that is, by itself, bad, but there are actions which are, and maybe you should go read Augustinian philosophy about this instead of hecks bear dot net"