this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2025
9 points (90.9% liked)

AskHistorians

1156 readers
26 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Jesus is still a work of fiction. You were specifically asking about a work of fiction.

Could habe easily used Jesus as an example but ya went much further.

Leave religion to the idiots that believe in it. This isn't the place

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

The consensus among modern historians is that Jesus did indeed exist.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The piece of fiction has enormous historical relevance, and depends on the greater historic context of the time. You could easily ask similar questions from a historical perspective about Don Quixote or Jane Eyre.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Jesus is still a work of fiction.

Absolutely, unequivocally incorrect. There is corroborating evidence in Josephus. Jesus was one of many troublemaking itinerant messianic claimants at the time. This doesn’t mean anything supernatural, but no mainstream historian doubts the existence of a historical Jesus.

Disbelieving in the religion does not mean that you get to throw the entire thing out. Muhammad similarly was a real figure - this does not mean we have to be Muslims. Disbelieving in mainstream academic consensus solely because of your ideology does not make you any different from a creationist.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

Your first 3 words says it all. They're both works of fiction.

You can believe what you want but, but The Life of Brian is less of a work of fiction than all forms of religious texts.