this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2025
387 points (97.5% liked)

politics

25456 readers
1494 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 95 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Sorry if anyone got their hopes up.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 75 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm honestly torn. Trump is definitely being "handled" by the Project 2025 architects (the Heritage Foundation), but he is such an idiotic narcissistic ass that he also tends to fuck their plans up a bit. Vance, on the other hand, will be a dutiful little soldier boy, and not get in their way so much - which is why the HF got Trump to pick him despite the bad blood between them. I'm really a bit more scared of that - kind of a "be careful what you wish for" situation.

[–] MacGuffin94@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You're forgetting that cults don't continue when the leader is gone. Trump doesn't his entire life getting people to believe him and love him or hate him he is good at it. Vance sucks. No one likes him and he will not be able to continue the grift when Donny dies. They have no one past him that can handle the base and the party. There is going to be a lot more pain when he is gone because of all the fighting. Better case unfortunately would be for midterms to happen then he dies then at least there's a chance the GOP won't have full control over the government

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, Scientology is doing pretty well since the death of L Ron Hubbard.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And Mormonism, The Children of God/The Family, Aleph/Aum Shinrikyo, etc.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago

Hell, Christianity pretty much started as a Roman era cult around Jesus.

[–] waddle_dee@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

These are just taking in the cults that have succeeded. It's survivorship bias. There's countless more cults that have died out, or faded away time, and time again.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

All true, but we are very near a point with USA where Vance doesn't need a cult following, he can rule as a dictator supported by oligarchs. He already has the military and intelligence services and the supreme court. The rest will follow, as resistance is weeded out by those powers.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is the goal of Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation.

The goal isn't so much who leads it, as long as it's the wealthy white Christian Nationalists.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh yes, I don't think Trump planned this alone, he simply doesn't have the brains for it.

Trump, like the other billionaires involved in HF, definitely had a part in crafting it.

Probably less of a "this is how we do it" and more of a "who do I have to grift to get what I want?"

[–] Cybersec@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

I agree. Hopefully without popular support we could get his grip to crumble from within if enough people despise him both internally and externally.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's kinda what I mean - if Trump dies now, the HF still has plenty of time left before the midterms to do the most damage possible using Vance. I'm sure they have their marionette strings tied to enough Republican Congress critters to get their stuff done even without Trump's bullying & they can coach Vance on the rest. If Trump goes, I think I'd rather it be a LOT closer to the midterm election.

ETA: Don't forget they're the party in power, and can change all sorts of things that will affect their chances in the election, too. Those things don't have to hold up legally, just cause legal delays that let them keep power.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah but MAGA doesn't have cult leader boner for Vance. They wouldn't let him shit in their mouths. Trump on the other hand...

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They're still going to be loyal to the party because they've been brainwashed to think Democrats (who are unfortunately the only other viable option) are out to destroy them & their way of life. It's gonna take a long time for that to wear off for any significant number of them - during which time another acolyte may be found to carry the torch.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I disagree. As I said, they will not let Vance shit in their mouths.

I think the cult will carry a torch for Trump, and Vance - as Trump's "chosen" successor - can be coached by the HF (likely already has been) to rally the troops effectively enough to achieve their goals. I agree Vance is likely to fuck something up enough eventually to turn the base off, but not right away - and that's possibly just enough time to do a lot more damage.

Don't get me wrong - I hope I'm wrong and you're right - but I just can't be sure, and so am hoping for the best while planning for the worst.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Caption: “My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined.”

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

What the fuck was he reviewing? I watched a couple of his food reviews before, but never had the honor of seeing whatever thing from Popeye's.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I believe he was taste-testing the Popeye’s chicken sandwich

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 2 points 14 hours ago

I went and did the work I should have before asking. It wasn't their chicken sammy, it was the cheddar biscuit butterfly shrimp.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I don't want Trump dead. I want to see him pay in some way for his countless crimes.

If he just dies because he's old, then he's never faced any justice.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would prefer that, too, but reality is that's extremely unlikely to happen. As such, I'm more focused on getting through this so the damage can be undone as quickly as possible.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He's been convicted of 34 felonies. If he is removed from his position due to poor health, for example, he can at least be sentenced.

I think the incredible amount of shit he's been able to get away with demonstrates that there's virtually no chance of him being removed from office by the current Congress. He could probably murder someone, and as long as they were unimportant to Republicans he'd get away with it.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He already was sentenced for that. He can't be re-sentenced. Unfortunately.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

How did I miss that? I thought his sentencing was simply delayed. "Unconditional discharge"? Fuck that.

[–] Cybersec@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He wasn’t sentenced (given the terms of the punishment) yet right? The judge, put that step on hold for after his term.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

No, unfortunately it was not a hold. It was an unconditional discharge. Basically a sentence of nothing. There will be no consequences for him committing all those felonies.

[–] Cybersec@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have no hope for him to face real punishment. My greatest hope is that her suffers real badly in the polls and is terribly unliked - so badly his consonant dissonance has to be at full steam trying to gaslight out of it.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

did you mean cognitive dissonance?

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There are more important things than that you get to see an old man unhappy. In the grand scheme, it doesn't matter compared to the ongoing global chaos and harm to humans.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Punishing Trump is about the ongoing global chaos and harm to humans. The people most responsible for perpetrating these crimes see themselves as beyond the law. They need to see that there are lines that, if they cross the line, they will die in disgrace like a common criminal.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

There's a pretty high chance that he will go unpunished until the day he dies, so you're going to want to plan for getting justice in other ways. Probably from people who are still alive at that point.

[–] cowfodder@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I also don't want him dead. I want him locked in after a massive stroke.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

He could be double locked in. Locked in syndrome while locked in prison.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

With his caretakers who are relatives of those he whose lives he ruined and secretly torture him whenever no one else is around and he can't tell anyone.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Would making Trump face justice undo any of his crimes?

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The same could be said for any crimes, yet we still punish those criminals. I simply think he should be held to account like any other human would be.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly, punishment as a concept is a backwards method of solving crime.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So, the solution in your opinion is…?

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 hours ago

Rehabilitation and harm reduction.

[–] iglou@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

At this point it is more important to not have him damage the world any further than to get justice. I'll be happy if he stops being president even if he doesn't get any sort of justice coming for him. This just has to stop.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

you think this will end with dumpy? The oligarchs have already planned for dumpy's demise. The call him baby faced vance.

[–] iglou@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

They won't get far without the support of Americans. Vance won't rally the Trump cultists.

It's not an actual dictatorship. Yet.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

I don't even care if he dies, just let him drool in a corner somewhere.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It would certainly mitigate the impact of his crimes on his many victims.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

Well JD said he was ready to step into the president's position. Maybe he was disappointed, or ahead of himself a bit.