this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
119 points (97.6% liked)
chat
8511 readers
252 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have very deep anarchist sympathies, but often find myself at odds with people who seem to think anarchism means the future is luxury space communism and lives of idleness. Not, in reality, surrendering a lot of the trinkets we can only have as they are extracted by empire. Accepting that life will be full of hard and often unpleasant labour but that we will be emotionally richer and the result will be closer to justice.
Also that to get there we're gonna have to be violent, and the thing about violence is people get hurt.
I definitely have no patience for the radlib types that I've been seeing browbeating and tut tutting leftists for wanting a revolution. "Don't you know a revolution would hurt disabled people?" "Oh so I guess we just won't do anything until the glorious revolution?" etc etc
Well see, the thing is that the people huddled wet and cold in the street. They're not really people. The Nepali miners with freeze burns on their hands so you can have salt with visually pleasing contamination? They're well... you know. That blackfella dying in hospital because people think he's faking pain for drugs? You've got to understand these are complex issues we simply must have patience with. Incremental chain my good friend incremental change.
If we're not careful people could suffer you know?
Oh god I fucking hate that whole strain of calling any problem they don’t want to confront “nuanced” or “complex”. It’s not complex, you just don’t want to admit that you’re the kind of person who’s fine with letting others suffer
In their minds, revolution has to be perfect and polite to be worth trying at all
God yes it pisses me off to no end. I often think about how invisible state violence is to half the chucklefucks.
Like chemical weapons, torture devices, beating, cages, screaming, and hitting. These things are used to stop someone taking surplus, discarded food from a bin but if that person says enough. If that person says "No, I will not suffer and die in indignity. I will kill you, you who would kill me" and like beats some cop to death or the person who would call the cops on them. They're the violent party? Really? The person that was content to subsist off of literal garbage if it meant peace.
No. Fuck that. We have tried asking nicely, I will always maintain that forgiveness be offered if people seek to change but when people horde wealth and use the machinery of law to deprive people of the necessities of life. Things they would often not even notice being gone. Yes I am willing to hurt them, and yes I am willing to accept that mistakes will happen as we try and halt this horrible orphan crushing machine.
What is the alternative? Children are dying. What good are ideals if they would have you sit by and do nothing while children are dying.
I have that quote saved in my phone to read at people when I'm feeling insufferable.
The funny thing to me is that these people will also defend the use of violence in “self” (read: property) defence. Like they will condone violent fantasies about what they’d do if someone hurt their family or robbed their houses. But when it comes to other people’s children, or indigenous people, or poor people, it’s all kumbaya-didn’t-you-know-Martin-Luther-was-a-pacifist
A revolution is a dinner party, or writing an essay, or painting a picture, or doing embroidery; it has to be so refined, so leisurely and gentle, so temperate, kind, courteous, restrained and magnanimous.
Ideally something that can be done and dusted on one’s day off, or at most, over a weekend.
Bold of them to say this when Canada's doing MAID, also known as Literally Aktion T4 But Neoliberal.
I never understand this argument. Do radlibs think revolutions purposefully target and hurt disabled people or something?
IMO it's a sound argument (disabled people who need medications will struggle to get that medicine during a revolutionary war) but it's not valid, because disabled workers are socially murdered under capitalism, unless they are lucky enough to have family or other people around them to support them.
I am a huuuuge fan or Ursula and particularly the dispossessed.
It's obviously fiction but I think it's good to get people thinking about how labour, i.e. doing stuff for productive ends, and work in our current society are different.
Not all labour is onerous work, anyone who's cooked with friends has direct experience in how a task is transformed by the context it's peformed in.
Yeah, same. I think it's the most realistic fictional look at what a real, fully developed anarcho-communist society might look like, warts and all. It's not FAL(G)SC by any means, and it's not a perfect world. People still suffer and do each other wrong, but there's a dignity, solidarity, and (as you said) justice running through it that makes everything better. One of my favorite books.