this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
262 points (99.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

38798 readers
401 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I used to leave my name, personal cell # and an apology at the top of any of my dynamic SQL queries. I know what its going to be like, man, I wrote that shit. I'm so sorry.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bold move.. Hopefully you're not getting calls in 10 years when stuff breaks and you're at a different company

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

(Public sector, if this stuff goes down people don't get their heart meds so I don't overly mind the stale followup calls. Tho I'll be shocked if any of that code is still in use, most of it was being obsoleted even back when I still worked there)

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Plus then you can bill as an independent contractor.

[–] afk_strats@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wish I was working on your stuff back when I supported stinky 2008 T-SQL where everything was dynamic and sequential. I would have called you just for moral support

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Comon over to Tsql 2022! Nothing has changed, except the AI is writing the dynamic SQL now so you don't have to! It's going great!

[–] afk_strats@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Just to be clear, I think T-SQL is fine and apparently they added some string agg function so you don't have to hack XML_agg so... Something improved. But stinky spaghetti SQL is unfixable

dynamic SQL. I remember those days. I once got criticized by colleagues for "breaking" a dynamic SQL search query - you know the one - because I realized that it wasn't building most of the query. I have no idea how it worked, but I made it put out actually valid SQL and it took forever. I forget if we rolled that back. We were using MS TFS, so probably not haha