this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
554 points (90.0% liked)

196

5596 readers
995 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Are these Russian and Chinese agents who want to divide "us" (who do you mean with "us"?) In the room with us right now?

Any time you see “the left” pitted against “liberals”, you can safely ignore whatever bullshit else is on the page.

I guess I can ignore about 150 years of history then, huh? Liberalism is a right-wing ideology, homie.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Liberalism is a right-wing ideology, homie.

Liberalism

The doctrine of liberalism considers personal freedom to be the most important goal.

The pursuit of personal freedom is right-wing? I didn't know that. I still don't know that!

Does the left-wing oppose personal freedom as a top priority?

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know what source that is and I don't want to open that link again.

Liberalism also has the guarantee of private property as another "most important goal", which is why the ideology is so in favour of capitalism.

Also, liberals mostly focus on negative freedom, i.e. freedom from inhibitions, while e.g. leftists focus on freedom to do something.

So, yeah. Focusing on the freedom to squeeze your tenants for rent, destroy the environment, exploit your fellow humans, etc. is right wing.

If you really want to understand the "left-right" political framework, I can't recommends the channel "what is politics" on youtube enough. This video should be a short intro to the topic, while this one goes into more detail.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

no true scotsman

No, you don't get to decide which personal freedoms count & which don't in what they stand for: they stand for personal freedoms.

Liberalism is broad, and the linked site on party classifications shows it's neither left nor right wing, though more specific subclassifications can be placed somewhere. Broadly

it favours free markets, free trade, limited governments, low taxes and private property (economic liberalism) as well as equality for all citizens under the law, civil rights, secularism and freedom of speech and religion.

You're neglecting subclassification

Social liberalism: Social liberal parties stress civil and human rights and favour a social market economy.

which is leftist. Leftism is the pursuit of equality/egalitarianism.

Let's not pretend conservative liberalism or neoliberalism is the only liberalism.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

No, you don't get to decide which personal freedoms count & which don't in what they stand for: they stand for personal freedoms.

I don't decide. I analyse. Liberals focus on negative freedoms. That is political reality.

Liberalism is broad, and the linked site on party classifications shows it's neither left nor right wing, though more specific subclassifications can be placed somewhere. Broadly

OP meant liberal parties in the political context of the so-called "USA". In that context, liberalism is right wing.

You're neglecting subclassification

How. Your quote conicides with my argument. Liberalism is in favour of capitalism.

which is leftist. Leftism is the pursuit of equality/egalitarianism.

No. Watch the videos. Leftism is in favour of dismantling existing hierarchichal power structures in favour of equality. A "social market economy" is still capitalist.

Let's not pretend conservative liberalism or neoliberalism is the only liberalism.

They have vital things in common. And I (and OOP) oppose pretty much the complete intersection.

Back to topic: Liberals in the US definetly opposed the abolition of ICE. Probably because of the whole "rule of law" bu&iness in liberalism and because they think that ICE protects the interests of capital.

[–] indomara@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Scarily enough, Eastern European bot farms with strong ties to Russia have been all over the internet for ages.

https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/09/16/1035851/facebook-troll-farms-report-us-2020-election/

Also, Microsoft releases reports on foreign influence ahead of US elections:

https://msblogs.thesourcemediaassets.com/sites/5/2023/11/MTAC-Report-2024-Election-Threat-Assessment-11082023-2-1.pdf

https://msblogs.thesourcemediaassets.com/sites/5/2024/04/MTAC-Report-Elections-Report-Nation-states-engage-in-US-focused-influence-operations-ahead-of-US-presidential-election-04172024.pdf

These influences now have moved overseas to the UK and Australia.

It's pretty universally accepted by anyone who cares enough to look that there are Eastern European (Russian) bot farms manipulating social media to divide and weaken Western countries.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Scarily enough, Eastern European bot farms with strong ties to Russia have been all over the internet for ages.

yeah, it's how we got brexit and trump

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And... the explicit anarchist is a russian troll now? O.o

[–] indomara@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't follow.

I was simply replying to the statement:

Are these Russian and Chinese agents who want to divide "us" (who do you mean with "us"?) In the room with us right now?

With some facts about that sort of thing happening, since many people seem to be unaware and take a similar tone implying it's crazy.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Just because something exists, doesn't mean it's valid to accuse someone of being that thing whenever they say something you don't like.

Nazis exist, too. That doesn't mean it's valid to accuse Anark of being a nazi.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Also, Microsoft releases reports on foreign influence ahead of US elections

Funny how they also sell the “solutions” to this scary “problem”.