this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
40 points (97.6% liked)

askchapo

23252 readers
193 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Its been written down in history as a gigantic failure; this era's Vietnam. But as far as post WWII US invasions go, it met its goals in the end. Even if it tanked the reputations of everyone involved. A flat tax and foreign private interest rights remain ensrined in the Iraqi constitution. And its just democratic enough to earnestly tell the US to fuck off but not sovereign enough to ever make them.

This is strictly in comparison to other US invasions. Compared to Vietnam, Korea, and Afghanistan its was an actual - if only marginal - success. You have to reach into all the minor, "light touch", interventions to find something more successful.

Anyways I'm not trying to be like "the Iraq War was good, actually". Its just had this reputation of being the "dumb war" compared to Afghanistan. But after the US flat out gave Afghanistan back to the Taliban, we should reevaluate its position in US interventions and recognize how many are total abject failures.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 42 points 7 months ago (1 children)
  • Over a million dead Iraqi civilians, so to our bloodthirsty warmongering government officials who can only get off if they're looking at pictures of dead people, it was a massive success.

  • Lot of public money delivered to private corporations via the war and all it took was laundering that money through human blood, but they were just Middle Easterners and didn't count, so to the corrupt and venal fucks who started the war, yes, massive success.

  • Destroyed a relatively stable country in the middle east, started ISIS, destabilized the entire region, weakened neighboring countries with that destabilization, so yes, it was a massive success.

I take issue with billing Iraq as the "dumb war" because it opens up the exact line of inquiry you are making, which misses the point. It opens the war up to questions or defense that it was "effective" at achieving its goals and then says "well, those dopey Americans are so incompetent that they failed to achieve their goals!" Not saying you'd do that, but libs and conservatives are eager to rehabilitate the war and downplay how bad it was. Better to call it a mistake, and then say "actually it worked out for our interests so it wasn't such a mistake", than to look at the actual problem with the war.

The problem with the war is not that it was a "failure". The problem is that it murdered a fuckton of people.. The Iraq War is the most dramatic crime against humanity the US had committed this century until it helped Israel massively accelerate and intensify the genocide in Palestine.

Many years ago I was friends with a conservative who told me she'd learned at school that I was right when I said the soldiers don't fight for our freedom. Her professors at her super rich elite private conservative college had explained to her that the army does not fight for our freedom, it fights for our way of life. Our way of life that requires economic power imbalances in our favor, which requires keeping other regions of the world destabilized, weak, and dependent on making favorable deals with the US.

The Iraq War did not achieve its maximalist goals of smoothly installing a puppet regime that would turn Iraq into a vassal state ripe for economic exploitation under the guise of "rebuilding" and "foreign development", but it did achieve its minimal goals of sowing chaos.

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

From a cynical pro-imperialist viewpoint almost everything you listed goes in the pro column. Except for your conservative friend getting disillusioned. The US has a long history of butchering occupations because it has no idea how to do them other than "kill the savages". IMO Iraq was the first time the actually earnestly tried to set up a vassal state and were marginally successful. But in the process, ramped up the butchery and burned through basically every gram of domestic support.

[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yep!

Oh and she wasn't disillusioned. She still thought this was fine and good. There's a reason she's no longer a friend.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It is oddly chilling when you meet someone like that. Someone who fully understands the nature of capitalism, isn't a capitalist themselves, but still supports the system, because they'd happily have a million Iraqi children murdered so they can get their fast food and funko pops. It's just a level of cruelty and inhumanity I can barely comprehend.

[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 7 months ago

those people get the wall.

[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 2 points 7 months ago

Yes. It's selective empathy.