this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
71 points (100.0% liked)
Ukraine
10513 readers
268 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
Community Rules
πΊπ¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
π»π€’No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
π₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
π·Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
β Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
π³ Defense Aid π₯
π³ Humanitarian Aid βοΈβοΈ
πͺ Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
To slow down Ukrainian forces if they crossed the border.
I would think they could destroy a bridge if they were being forced away from it without needing to set explosives on a bridge they are, presumably, still using.
I mean, good, I hope Russia keeps doing things like that. Still. Seems odd to me.
Destroying a bridge is very very difficult. Except if you can get the supports down. But that's usually not very easy because they are covered by the bridge.
It's quicker and more effective. It takes time to get a bomber loaded and in the air. Also, they've been trying to destroy a bridge in Kherson for more than a week and it's still very useable.
Oh I wasn't thinking about bombers. I was thinking more like ground forces just firing a rocket at the supports if they are forced away from the bridge, but I guess that would be significantly less reliable.
Rocket won't do shit. You need people with charges to go in and mine it. If opponent is close, that sapper group could meet enemy fire.