this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
103 points (93.3% liked)

Asklemmy

50847 readers
907 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My country has had a civil war, invasions by the french, by the spanish, more recently a revolution that threw a fascist government, followed by a very colourful period of internal squirmishes between anti-regime forces, but we settled those events and that was that: off to the history books.

What motivates so many people to re-enact battles from the American Civil War?

It sounds cruel. Re-enacting a war where so many died gruesome deaths.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 25 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It seems like you have two questions combined into one. First, is why do people do historic reenactment of wars? Second, why do Americans choose this war?

For the first answer, performing historic reenactment of wars isn't solely an American thing. It is common for Europeans to reenact Napoleonic war battles. I've also seen cases of people dressing up as Roman soldiers in military camp. Beyond that, historical reenactment of various forms of veracity are common in different parts of the world as a type of cosplay. Wars end up being a popular thing to cosplay because there is narrative conflict; it is a real life story.

Why the American Civil War? It is a very significant war in American history, one of the three most important wars. Compared to World War II, it isn't problematic to depiction both sides fighting; it is a lot more problematic for people to dress in Nazi, Imperial Japanese, or even fascist Italian uniforms. Compared to the American Revolution, the uniform matches more modern fashion, so it is easier to buy equipment to cosplay. Also, the equipment was mass produced, so it is easier to buy replica equipment, including firearms.

[–] Surenho@beehaw.org 11 points 2 months ago

Not questioning it but it is interesting how it is not seen as problematic to depict and dress as fighting for the confederacy when it was in favour of keeping slaves, but Nazis are too much.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

I've also seen cases of people dressing up as Roman soldiers in military camp

Saw that at an SCA gathering once: apparently just a squad, but they were absolutely impressive.

Spoke pig-latin amongst themselves because no one could speak real Latin and they wanted to sound "latin-y" when out with the provincials.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, isn't there a French guy who's made a whole career out of looking like Napoleon in reenactments?

Compared to World War II, it isn’t problematic to depiction both sides fighting; it is a lot more problematic for people to dress in Nazi, Imperial Japanese, or even fascist Italian uniforms.

Honestly I'd rate the Japanese or Italians as slightly less problematic, and the Nazis on a similar level. American chattel slavery was deeply fucked up. Hasn't anyone watched Roots?

Of course, way too many participants are denialists about that bit.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd rate the Italians as less problematic, but the Imperial Japanese have a lot of blood on their hands as well.

And as horrific chattel slavery has come out to be, there are still whitewashers of it.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, the Italians were pretty brutal domestically and in north Africa, and were the original fascists, but I'd say the Japanese were probably worse. As a non-historian, it seems complicated by the fact they were a copy of the European empires they were contemporary with, who also did messed up things in colonies, even if according to the historians I've read they did go further.

The Nazis were very open about wanting all the terrible things, and very distinct from the people they fought against, so they go in the worst-of-the-worst bucket with the Belgians in Congo, ISIS and Dixie.

And as horrific [as] chattel slavery has come out to be

Was ever fully forgotten? Like, it's definitely spoken about more openly now than in the early or mid 20th century, but the abolitionists of the day and living memory afterwards were quite active documenting exactly how fucked up it was.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Was [it] ever fully forgotten?

Among some people, yes. For some, there is a willful ignorance.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Lol, I did the same thing. Whoops!