this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
535 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

12891 readers
808 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Car companies realize that streets full of their products look terrible

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Cars used to be awesome, now they suck. Go look at pictures of cars from the 40s to 60s or 79s even... there is no comparison.

[–] twisted@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This isn’t necessarily true. Even back then the streets were filled with shitbox cars that all looked the same. But only the cars that were beautiful and unique are still remembered and the rest are forgotten

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't know, I think the streets were probalby really rad in like the late 40's early 50's. I mean:

[–] twisted@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If you ignore all the nice neon and look at just the cars all you see are a bunch of similar looking cars. They all look like a Chevy Bel-Air to me. Now I am sure a 50s car enthusiasts would be able to name them all, but to your average person there aren’t any significant differences.

This is the same for cars today as well. Maybe 60 years in the future people will reminisce about the good old days of the Mazda Miata, Shelby Mustang, or Toyota Supra without realizing that these cars were few and far between and the streets were actually just filled with cheap Toyotas and Kias and Nissan Altimas.

They all look like a Chevy Bel-Air to me.

Nothing wrong with that!

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I always love the “cars all look the same these days” comment as if vehicles of every decade weren’t closely following the same design trends. Cars today don’t look the exact same unless you’re blind, especially if these people are supposed to be enthusiasts, so the other option is these people are just fuckin’ stupid.

One thing I will give older cars, though, is that at least they were colourful. I have a WRB BRZ(that’s mostly parked because I have great public transit options) and I feel so out of place not because it’s a sportscar but because it’s not a greyscale mass of shit rolling down the grey road.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

But the shit boxes people were driving in the 60s were VW Beetles, an objectively good looking car. Easily the most popular car of the 60s was the Mustang, an objectively beautiful car.

The real shit boxes didn't start popping up until after the oil crisis in 73.

The real shit boxes didn’t start popping up until after the oil crisis in 73.

How dare you rip on the Pacer and the Gremlin!

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Some of the conformity is safety. Cars today are generally designed with crumple zones, airbags, and other safety measures in mind. That leads to them looking similar to other cars designed with the same requirements.

There are still some beautiful cars today, but they are outliers. For example, I saw a Honda Prologue recently and loved it. It has a somewhat unique look that was much more obvious in person. And the Alfa Romeo Stelvio and Giulia, while bigger than their older brethren, always make me smile.

There are other examples. But largely, cars have become pretty samey and boring.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago

stuff like the VW buzz shows that you don't even need to deviate much for it to stand out quite a lot, just a slightly different shape and 2 colours and bam i instantly like it so much more than the standard car

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

79s even

Uh, my first car ever was a '79 Chevy Malibu. There has never been a more boring basic car in existence, and for good measure it was mechanically a piece of shit. The only good thing about it was that it had once been owned by semi-famous comic book artist P. Craig Russell.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

You throw the right tires and tint some windows on a Malibu, and it looks like a car with attitude.

Otherwise yeah, it's fairly mundane, I agree.