this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
120 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

689 readers
519 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

good news / bad news on banning books: very few people read books so they are not as relevant. probably lower priority to ban.

[–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Didn't stop them from going after libgen and zlibrary the last couple of years

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 1 points 2 months ago

That's more driven by profit motive than fear of people finding education. They have effectively banned books by making the population complicit in their own illiteracy. Diffuse Spectacle hits different.

[–] Enjoyer_of_Games@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago

as always "if _____ could change anything it would be illegal"