Asklemmy

49792 readers

591 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

Can a stochastic process be considered 'automation'? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 6 days ago by patatas@sh.itjust.works to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Thinking specifically about AI here: if a process does not give a consistent or predictable output (and cannot reliably replace work done by humans) then can it really be considered "automation"?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 6 days ago

NNs do give a consistent output. If you put the same inputs and seed in you get the exact same output every time.

The algorithm represented by the NN is fully deterministic, but way too large for a human to wrap their head around it.

All machines are automation, i think?