this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
331 points (81.9% liked)
memes
16673 readers
3754 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
$111 and released 2 years ago. But still, closer than I thought. Amazon 3rd party seller is kinda cheating though.
But my question remains, are we upset with Apple because they haven't provided a low budget option? There are so many good reasons to be angry with companies; "Their products are out of my price range" is like the lamest one.
The Samsung A06 was launched (in Germany) in May (2025) and you can get it for ~80€.
Anyway, we're not talking about being angry with Apple, we're talking about why Apple is perceived more expensive/less affordable than Android. The reason: they don't have cheap/inexpensive phones (or anything inexpensive in any category). Apple is marketed as a premium brand, has premium prices, and we're making fun of that.
I did a quick search - a nice option it seems.
That's fair - but the prices aren't really a premium are they? They're just standard. What Apple is lacking is budget phones like Samsung. Less features, less performant hardware, less cost. What I'm getting at is that Samsung has many more "premium" options compared to Apple - yet because Apple's options are only "premium" they're considered the phone for rich assholes with too much money, so maybe we should just be making fun of those people instead, regardless of their phone.
They're standard for premium ranges.
The thing is, Apple markets themselves as a brand for wealthy, hipster kind of people, plus iPhones are very easily identifiable. Samsung never branded itself like that and with all the different (and third party) cases you usually don't spot them on first glance.
We make fun of the people that buy the branding by making fun of the brand. And I usually don't see people making fun of those who buy refurbished or used iPhones from five years or so, but of those who always have the newest generation.
You perfectly defended my prior comment. Much obliged, nothing to add.
100€ is about $115. So it's under 100€.
You gonna respond to anything else I mentioned or are you just gonna drop a useless pedantry and leave?
Nothing else you mentioned matters. I provided you a link to a Samsung phone under the specified price, as requested. The rest of your comment was useless pedantry.
Not sure you know what pedantry means but that’s alright.