this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
49 points (100.0% liked)
Bicycles
4320 readers
183 users here now
Welcome to !bicycles@lemmy.ca
A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!
Community Rules
-
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
-
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
-
No porn.
-
No ads / spamming.
-
Ride bikes
Other cycling-related communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The push for helmets in Netherlands is mainly from the "Safe" Traffic Association (the road lobby). It is also related to the boom in souped-up Fat bikes, which come with all kinds of issues besides helmets.
Yes, the video is a few years old -- but the research is solid and nothing has changed since then. MIPS is still snake-oil.
It's actual doctors who are advocating for it.
I remember looking into this, and not only are bike crashes unreported in the Netherlands, but head injuries are surprisingly high, too.
I know we like to use the Netherlands as the gold standard for safe cycling infrastructure, but the fact remains that people do get into crashes (on their own) with the safest cycling infrastructure in the world. We are, after all, on moving objects.
Helmets save lives and can prevent head injuries. There's no real debate here.
I don't think anyone would rather their head hit concrete or metal, at any speed, without a helmet on.
But, yes, there's definitely been a greater need for helmets with the introduction of ebikes, especially for older riders. That's a demographic that has clearly suffered a disproportionate rate of injuries.
The real-world data says otherwise. Every single place that mandated helmets (or heavily promoted) saw absolutely no reduction in death/injury. The classic example is Australia -- it had almost no helmet usage prior to passing a nationwide law. The law was strictly enforced with extremely high fines, and yet there was no real change comparing before/after the law. Similarly, all those cities which put in place bikeshare -- it was predicted by the helmet lobby that bikeshare would cause a spike in death/injury, but this also didn't happen. In fact, bikeshare cities perversely have lower overall death/injury.
So this is the fundamental problem with something like the VA Tech star ranking. It is just a laboratory model that does not reflect reality, and as such is completely useless.
A long ago clubmate of mine would disagree. She was launched headfirst through the passenger side window of a car that abruptly turned left in front of her. Her helmet was demolished, but her only injury was a dislocated shoulder. She brought the remains of the helmet to the next club meeting to show us.