this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
632 points (78.6% liked)

memes

16997 readers
3270 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kennystillalive@feddit.org 49 points 4 weeks ago (45 children)

Yeah, but one is extra bad for our enviroment while being a scam.

[–] polle@feddit.org 18 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

That's what i thought, too. I would never believed if someone telled me some years ago that there will be another scam (ai) that wastes even more power.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 17 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Just wait until somebody proposes an AI powered blockchain…

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

The ultimate techbro venn diagram.

[–] polle@feddit.org 5 points 4 weeks ago

💀. Thats darker than anything else.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Stop giving them ideas

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago

I seriously thought your punchline was going to be the pacific garbage patch from all that extra consumption we've encouraged.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 10 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (24 children)

totally agree re bitcoin, and also am very sceptical of crypto as a mass-adopted currency in general

however there are plenty of networks that don’t use proof of work to validate their chains, and they aren’t bad for the environment to nearly the same degree

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

They are still very unstable and rely on some sort of consensus. It is flat out a bad design. It would be safer to pay with stocks.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

consensus is basically what all modern databases rely on… it’s not unstable; it has properties that need to be well known and accounted for

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

The problem is using that for something world wide with no backing by anything material.

It is unstable by nature

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

i tend to agree for mass-adopted currency, but mass currency is only 1 use case for blockchain

things like bank to bank transfers (think a replacement to swift: with semi trusted entities like a big group of banks, the proof functions can be both extremely efficient and fast whilst remaining scalable and distributed so nobody has control… of course this would be a private network, but every bank involved can audit and sign off on transactions)

blockchain at its core is an immutable log between untrusted parties… it can be used to prove a particular thing happened at a particular point, in situations where people don’t even trust governments etc to maintain accurate records

it’s too big and cumbersome to be used by everyone in the world for payment, but it’s a good facilitator of some niche things that most people won’t have any idea about

the technology is solid; it’s just very limited, and the most “profitable” and marketable uses are also the most ill-suited

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] sun@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 weeks ago

I am NOT a crypto fan, but not all cryptocurrencies are bad for the environment. Ethereum is proof of stake.

load more comments (42 replies)