this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
353 points (96.1% liked)

Greentext

6832 readers
1060 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Funny to read the comments. I don't want to judge anyone as Im not american and I grew up without even touching a real gun.

Its just amazing how big role guns play in US culture. I can't imagine owning one, but most americans can't live without them. Its very bizarre.

[–] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 28 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's not most Americans. It's about a third (which is still huge) and less than half of the population living in a gun owning household.

Then there's a spectrum of how "important" guns are culturally. There are in my experience 3 categories of gun owners.

  1. People who own a gun or two. They may take it to the range or hunt, but mostly it's tucked securely away and they don't think about it or use it.

2)Then there are collectors and enthusiasts. They enjoy firearms as a hobby. They have multiple. They watch firearms videos on social media. They go to gun shows and might join a club related to the hobby.

3)Then there are the paranoid psychopaths for whom gun ownership and the insistence that they could have to defend themselves at any time is constantly at the forefront of their mind. They wish they had a reason to shoot someone and may end up shooting someone anyway.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I'm a #2 except I dislike gun shows. Everything's overpriced and there's right-wing merch everywhere. Bought a canteen from a Proud Boy at one. Didn't know it until I overheard him talking to another guy. Tried to investigate him later, couldn't get a name.

[–] Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Sorry bad phrasing, by most I meant a lot of americans. Thanks for correcting me :)

I am somewhat familiar with the type of gun owners from US media and movies.

For me the most mind-blowing thing is how easy is to get a gun at some places. I just imagine some shady people I know in my country, even some of my family members and can't imagine them having access to guns :D

[–] Alk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It perpetuates itself. If someone thinks there is a significant probability a burglar might have a gun, getting a gun themselves can increase their chance of survival. This is even ignoring the actual culture around it, where people want guns "just to have them".

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You don't own a gun in case of a burglar having a gun. It's in case of home invasion period. I'm not going to wait around to determine if they're armed or not and I'm not going to restrict myself to some lesser means of stopping them just because they aren't. I didn't create this situation and I am not going to accept risk to myself to preserve the life of some asshole who doesn't even respect me enough not to break into my home.

[–] Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Isn't this just a vicious cycle? You own a gun, because other people also have access to guns. The burglar might bring a gun, because the home owner possibly has a gun, etc

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 2 days ago

I don't own a gun, I am 100x more likely to use it on myself than need it for self defense where I'm at. But the scenario I'm describing, whether or not the home invader has a gun or not doesn't matter, the simple fact that they are invading your home in the first place justifies lethal force. You could be injured/killed by them even without them having a gun so the safest option for the resident is shoot them immediately. The resident should not have to accept any level of risk whatsoever in dealing with this situation. You're not getting a gun because someone might attack you with a gun. You're getting a gun because someone might attack you.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

Kinda. It’s also a remnant of the old west. Guns were freedom, protection, power, etc.

It would be much more effective to curb crime by meeting everyone’s basic needs than giving everyone a gun.

But dumb Americans don’t know any other way. They are just to self-centered and absorbed to think about anyone else.