345
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] IDew@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Fair tbh. Didn't know about this until know. But I would be VERY sus about a random USB rather than the source. But as you said, some less knowledged peeps could find it rather useful

[-] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

I'd agree. In theory, there are many legitimate reasons to "sell" FOSS software. If I was putting it on a DVD, labelling, and mailing FOSS software my time and materials certainly deserve to be rewarded. Likewise, listing it on closed store like the MS store but keeping it updated from sources might make it easier for people embedded in the MS ecosystem to keep up to date.

I would expect legitimate repackagers/redistributors to be open that the software itself is freely available though. Besides I fear the well is poisoned by hustlers trying to sell something free for cheap to make a quick buck.

[-] Piers@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

In my eyes it's no different than a publisher selling a book that is in the public domain. You're not paying them for their copyright, you're paying them for everything else that goes into putting a physical copy of that text into your hands.

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
345 points (98.3% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55056 readers
422 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS