this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
51 points (98.1% liked)

Selfhosted

49803 readers
507 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi everyone,

I’m visiting some family in another area of the country soon, and have the opportunity to set up a little remote backup server.

Essentially I would like to set something up that I can ssh into and backup photos/videos/documents from my main server periodically once a month or so. Ideally it would be off until I need to turn it on.

I’m looking for ideas on how to best approach this. What kind of hardware would you use in my shoes? I have a couple of spare raspberry pi’s I was thinking to use with an external drive. I was also considering something like those ugreen nas devices that have been popping up. I would ideally set it up and do a sync before I head there, and then just plug it in. Would wake on lan be advised for this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It depends on the sync / backup software

Syncthing uses a stored list of hashes (which is why it takes a long time for the initial scan), then it can monitor filesystem activity for changes to know what to sync.

Rsync compares all source and destination files with some magical high speed algorithm

Then, backup software does... whatever.

Back in the day on FAT filesystems they used the archive bit on each file's metadata, which was (IIRC) set during a backup and reset with any writes to that file. The next backup could then just backup those files.

Your current strategy is ok - just doing an offline backup after a bulk update, maybe it's just making that more robust by automating it...?

I suspect you have quite a large archive as photos don't compress well, and +2TBs won't disappear with dedupe... so, it's mostly about long term archival rather than highly dynamic data changes.

So that +2TB... do you drop those files in amongst everything else, or do you have 2 separate locations ie, "My Photos" + "To Be Organised"?

Maybe only backup "MyPhotos" once a year / quarter (for example), but fully sync "To Be Organised"... then you've reduced risk, and volume of backup data...?

[–] rehydrate5503@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Ahh ok, that makes sense. Hah magical algorithm.

Yeah it’s about 30TB of photos/videos. I only recently got into videography which takes up a ton of space. About 25% of that is videos converted into an editing codec, but I don’t have those backed up to external drives. I also have some folders excluded that I know have duplicates. A winter project of mine will be to clear out some of the duplicates, and then cull the photos/videos I definitely don’t need. I got into a bad data hoarding habit and kept everything even after selecting the keepers.

I have an in progress folder where I dump everything, then folders by year/month for projects and keepers. I need to do better with culling as I go.

I like that idea, I will incorporate it into my strategy.

Thank you for taking the time to help me out with this, much appreciated!