this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
133 points (98.5% liked)

politics

25004 readers
2515 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think I need help with this, because I also interact with some "low information" (I don't like that term) voters, who agree with me on a lot of policy. I struggle to extend the grace I need to because it makes me even more upset. At least fascists and racists have a real reason to vote for this. I'm having a convo with someone and they're ostensibly pro choice and pro gay rights, and they still voted Trump. When I ask about why they voted for him if Rs are historically anti those things it's because Trump is just "better for America". I try to reason and kindly ask questions etc and I hope I make some inroads, but internally I just dislike them as people. How am I supposed to square that? They care so little about their purported positions they don't actually care if they happen, so long as some other nebulous concept of America becoming great happens. It upsets me and I can't help but think they're just bad people who don't actually care about others, they're just too stupid to realize that. They know conceptually gay marriage is ok, they just don't actually believe it so are willing to throw it away for vibes? I don't know, sounds like being a bad person with extra steps.

Vibes based voting is stupid, but vibes over policy means you care more about vibes than policy, so how much do they really care about the policy? Also, what kind of person are you that you get good vibes from Trump?

I go back and forth with myself about this so much, but there's always a part that believes no matter how "low information" you are, you have seen or heard Trump do some heinous stuff that you are willing to overlook even though you don't know his actual policy stance. That's at least been my experience with low information voters. I wish there was just a magical phrase someone could say that would make me understand that not all Trump voters are bad people, but I've yet to come across it. Truly looking for more insight on this if anyone is willing to share.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Vibes based voting is stupid

This is a fact, but it's the reality we're dealing with. This is the very thing that Colbert was parodying all those years ago on the Colbert Report saying things like; I vote with my gut not my brain, and he doesn't like facts because they aren't 'truthy' enough, and reality has a liberal bias. This is essentially how these people think.

I have a lot of trouble talking to them too, because if you point out the failings of the republican party you get a "Well, the dems are worse." reflex. If you point out the pros of the democrats, you get a reflexive "Yeah, but they're all criminals." I sincerely believe that there is a conversational path you can walk to open their minds a bit,

I think that the democrats need to be taking notes from the Sanders, AOC, and now Mamdani on how to win over these voters. They talk about policies and goals that support the poor and the working class but the democrats, for the most part, are not going that route. Many seem to think saying that, I'm not the republican is good enough and it clearly isn't.

Thanks for sharing. I was just recently suggesting that populism from the left has the power to retake the culture, but the Dems are not taking advantage of that. Hopefully our conversations prove somewhat helpful in the grand scheme of things. I am seeing some movement from them, but not enough to feel like it's been worthwhile. Keep up the fight.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

I feel this. Its basically more infuriating where as if they are just straight up evil at least they would be voting consistant with their values. Every so often I have said im not sure which is worse evil or stupid but oftentimes I lean toward stupid. As much as we say policies favor the wealthy it really does not in a long term holistic way. The one cult expert guy has it right. It was only a few years ago that I realized mlm was a cult (I mean I always realized its a scam but never realized the people in it were so brainwashed) and he got me to realize it really is the same with maga.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's a question I have, and it's an honest one: Did you ask WHY ? and HOW?

One can't begin to understand another until those they are trying to understand provide those answers to those questions
..

Otherwise it's just two strangers making noise.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why and how what? Why and how Trump? Yes, I've asked, but it's not sensible. The other commenter seems to have had similar experiences where the answer is tautological or not grounded in reality. Trump is going to "get rid of the deep state". How/why? More nonsensical stuff. It's a cult at a certain point and you can't logic someone out of something they didn't logic themselves into. I am willing to engage with them but it's hard to not write them off as bad people if they were willing to go against logic and against helping people. The article itself points out these people are voting against things they say they want. That's not logical unless they want other things more, and the thing they want more than a progressive tax rate is some nonexistent vibe they want to achieve.

I can answer for both sides but they're unwilling to see that their how and why is flawed.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

You keep asking until you find that one nugget that can be shined. Then you shine it until it burns all the shit around it

Just my opinion