this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
256 points (99.6% liked)

Politics

878 readers
322 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
256
Republicans move to block Democratic effort to force release of Epstein files (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 month ago by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@sh.itjust.works
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Democrats had been pressing for an amendment to cryptocurrency legislation that would have forced the release of information and exhibits itemized in a list of evidence held by the justice department from the 2019 child sex-trafficking case against disgraced financier Epstein.

Democrats had weighed in on the issue, hoping to force a release of the documents. “The question with Epstein is: Whose side are you on?” California Democratic US House member Ro Khanna, the author of the Epstein measure, told Axios. “Are you on the side of the rich and powerful, or are you on the side of the people?”

But Republicans on the US House rules committee voted down the amendment that would have allowed Congress to vote on whether the evidence – which includes micro cassettes, DVDs, CDs including one labelled “girl pics nude book 4”, computer hard drives and three massage tables in green, beige and brown – should be released.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I just spent some time reading through this. Why isn't this list all over the news? Why is the news making a deal out of whether or not it's released, if it's already accessible?

[–] Ava@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This isn't a client list, it's his address book.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I added this to my comment so more people see it. Thanks for pointing that out, I was getting confused as well.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok, that makes sense. I just want to know why my mom is on there.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Your mom is in a lot of address books, including mine.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

This is his black book, which I think is a separate thing from the client list (though there’s likely some overlap).

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was apart of the previously released files. Everyone has seen what was in the white binders and released previously.

What we want is the client list. Not his rolladex