this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
89 points (94.1% liked)

News

35724 readers
2595 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Comparing MH370 to Earhart's plane is like comparing a muzzle loaded black powder canon to a GAU-8, two things that are technically in the same class but are on opposite ends of technological advancements. Earhart's plane was a prop plane that at worst would've been reduced to mangled scrap metal, MH370 on the otherhand was a passanger jet that at best would e been reduced to mangled scrap metal at worst it would've been effectively disintegrated with only the most durable elements holding up.

I doubt we will find anything more substantial than a flap or maybe a reinforced section of MH370, maybe a bag or suitcase on the smaller end. The only exception would be if it ran until put of fuel then glided until impact with the ocean or land, but even then it'd probably be pretty badly damaged and hard to identify.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Passenger planes are mostly aluminium. It's not likely to "disintegrate" all that much anytime soon. Also, a bunch of MH370 already washed up on the shores of Africa.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

When I say disintegrated I meant it in more of as it's root, not atomized but reduced to a basic level from its whole. Bits and pieces washing up in Africa is about what I'd expect but I doubt theres much more that a couple shredded chunks of the main body. Aluminum can break down pretty thoroughly under the right forces, speed and surface tension would be more than enough IMO.

Remember we're still finding WW2 era ships that we know roughly where they were when they sank and those are massive behemoths an aluminum scrap heap would be easily missed in comparison.