cars

514 readers

12 users here now

===============/c/cars================

Hexbear's premier community for the discussion of and questions about cars, motorcycles, and other low occupancy transit. Share your thoughts, discuss cars under communism, and ask questions about maintenance.

Anti-car posting is not permited. Train good car bad and all, but it's not what this comm is for.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

gaycomputeruser@hexbear.net

Wake@hexbear.net

For the past several years was Mazda the sole mainstream holdout for touchscreens. But Mazda caved and the new CX-5 has them. (www.thedrive.com)

submitted 1 week ago by InevitableSwing@hexbear.net to c/cars@hexbear.net

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] prole@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have a 2019 Toyota and when we got it a year or so ago, I was reading reviews and stuff. One of the biggest criticisms was that the interior seems outdated. I've never had a vehicle with any kind of touch screen, but this one just has a smallish one and a bunch of the normal knobs and buttons around it.

I'm typically not opposed to learning new tech or whatever, but touchscreens in cars is just the worst idea. Capacitive touch instead of buttons and switches is the second worst idea. All of this shit is just cost saving and not actually better, it just looks fancier

[–] WafflesTasteGood@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

It's not even entirely cost savings, there's definitely the angle making things less fixable. A button or switch is not only going to last longer than most touch interfaces but also be a cheaper part to replace.

Car companies have put massive efforts into engineering products that just barely outlast the warranty period. Touch screens are another part of that design while also being easy to showcase as "sleek" and "modern."