this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
425 points (99.5% liked)

World News

36940 readers
795 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Metadata embedded in the video and analyzed by WIRED and independent video forensics experts shows that rather than being a direct export from the prison’s surveillance system, the footage was modified, likely using the professional editing tool Adobe Premiere Pro.

Source

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 25 points 5 days ago (4 children)

They literally said they color corrected and enhanced parts of it for visibility. So yes, the footage was modified.

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 52 points 5 days ago (2 children)

But why? News agencies can do that if they wish, for the viewers, but why would a government agency releasing video evidence touch it up in any way? That's just asking for questions.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 30 points 4 days ago

I would assume it's to make the metadata seem more reasonable, so people pay less attention to the cut. 'The "perfectly innocent" act of "touching it up" is the reason the metadata says what it does, not because we removed part of it. Don't look any closer!'

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 days ago

Yeah I agree. Pretty sure the whole trust part goes out the window when you aren't releasing the actual raw footage to the press.

load more comments (1 replies)