this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
224 points (86.1% liked)

science

20065 readers
431 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (5 children)

What if you could have a grilled fish instead though?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Isn't that only an issue with some types of fish though, like tuna?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fish are carnivorous, and mercury is bioaccumulative. So, larger fish tend to have higher concentrations than smaller fish, but pretty much all fish have some level of mercury. There is no "safe" concentration.

But the real problem with your scenario is that I'd prefer hunger pangs over fish, grilled or otherwise.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Freshwater fish also exist, or areas with less contamination. If you won't eat fish though that sounds more like a you problem.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

Freshwater fish can still have mercury. Even farmed fish can have mercury contamination, if their feed is sourced from the wild.

If you won't eat fish though that sounds more like a you problem.

Nah, I'm perfectly happy with my hot dogs. You're the one eating broken thermometers and fluorescent lights.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)