this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
213 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

72015 readers
2738 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
213
Supreme Court (SCOTUS) upholds a Texas law that requires porn websites to verify that their visitors are 18 or older, rejecting a First Amendment challenge to the law (www.eff.org)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Pro@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Today’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton is a direct blow to the free speech rights of adults. The Court ruled that “no person—adult or child—has a First Amendment right to access speech that is obscene to minors without first submitting proof of age.” This ruling allows states to enact onerous age-verification rules that will block adults from accessing lawful speech, curtail their ability to be anonymous, and jeopardize their data security and privacy. These are real and immense burdens on adults, and the Court was wrong to ignore them in upholding Texas’ law.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

nope.

you clearly lack the imagination and intelligence.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Im sorry but no amount of text descriptions of gore or extreme violence can even remotely compare to photos or video of said gore or violence. Ever.

Thinking it can demonstrates a lack of intelligence.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Thinking it can, demonstrates a lack of intelligence.

ftfy

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Did you just add punctuation incorrectly in an attempt to prove your intelligence/downplay mine?

You do understand that the sentence you just wrote is grammatically incorrect, don’t you?