-3
submitted 1 year ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

The report is absolutely scathing. Some choice quotes:

But when the next crisis came, both the US and the governments of Europe fell back on old models of alliance leadership. Europe, as EU high representative for foreign affairs Josep Borrell loudly lamented prior to Russia’s invasion, is not really at the table when it comes to dealing with the Russia-Ukraine crisis. It has instead embarked on a process of vassalisation.

But “alone” had a very specific meaning for Scholz. He was unwilling to send Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine unless the US also sent its own main battle tank, the M1 Abrams. It was not enough that other partners would send tanks or that the US might send other weapons. Like a scared child in a room full of strangers, Germany felt alone if Uncle Sam was not holding its hand.

Europeans’ lack of agency in the Russia-Ukraine crisis stems from this growing power imbalance in the Western alliance. Under the Biden administration, the US has become ever more willing to exercise this growing influence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

That's a lot of words just to say "Germany hesitated about sending tanks to Ukraine therefore the US is now the colonial master of Europe."

Apparently that's all it takes. Just a slight hesitation on a decision and you lose all sovereignty forever.

Or maybe the hesitation over the tanks was a little disappointing, but not really that big a deal. Calm down people.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It was a bit late by then. Germany lost it's sovereignty right about the time the US turned up in Berlin to stop the Soviets from advancing any further.

If Germany really had sovereignty, would it really have done so little after it's 'allies' blew up Nordstream 2, causing German deindustrialisation and increasing German consumer and industrial energy insecurity?

[-] CAPSLOCKFTW@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

It was a bit late by then. Germany lost it's sovereignty right about the time the US turned up in Berlin to stop the Soviets from advancing any further.

When exactly did the US turned up in Berlin? They didn't. Western and soviet forces met at the river Elbe

Furthermore with the 4+2 treaty Germany got sovereignty officially, with the opposition to the illegal invasion of Iraq 2003 Germany went fully sovereign.

If Germany really had sovereignty, would it really have done so little after it's 'allies' blew up Nordstream 2, causing German deindustrialisation and increasing German consumer and industrial energy insecurity?

Who blew up Nordstream 2?

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

When exactly did the US turned up in Berlin? They didn’t. Western and soviet forces met at the river Elbe

Semantics. It's like when people say 'Washington' even if the sharp part of the story is happening on the other side of the world.

Furthermore with the 4+2 treaty Germany got sovereignty officially, with the opposition to the illegal invasion of Iraq 2003 Germany went fully sovereign.

And yet, here we are, with German industry falling apart because the US dictated, 'Sanction Russia', and all the vassals fell in line. Then they supplemented the now-re-routed-but-still-Russian fossils with US supplies. The German ruling class sacrificed the German people for US interests in the same way as did (every) other vassal state(s).

Who blew up Nordstream 2?

Greatest mystery of our time.

[-] CAPSLOCKFTW@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Germany industry does fine considering the circumstances. "Falling apart" is greatly exaggerated.

Not letting Putin get Eastern Ukraine for free is in interest of german people. No sacrifice. Why would this be US interests? You're talking propaganda

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
-3 points (28.6% liked)

World News

32291 readers
666 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS