this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
193 points (99.0% liked)

Public Freakout

2708 readers
281 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 51 points 1 day ago (8 children)

"He's a former Antifa member. Antifa!"

Every time they say that word, the immediate response should be, "So you're saying you're pro-fascism?"

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

For them antifa isn't anti fascism the same way for us "for the children" bills aren't for the children.

They do a distinction between the organisation/movement and the concept, even when there really isn't in this case.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Why should we care about them misusing language?

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You shouldn't, but staying that they don't understand the meaning of the word is incorrect regardless.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

and their lack of understanding should be highlighted and ridiculed, not compensated and interpreted for them

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

But you are not highlighting that lack of understanding, you are fabricating a new one and highlighting that one. As stated, they don't believe that Antifa is just an abbreviation of anti-fascism, they believe that it's the name of an evil organisation that is branding itself as the abbreviated form of anti fascism.

We should ridicule them for thinking that Antifa is the new Illuminati, not for not knowing that Antifa = anti-fascism because that's not true.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

I'm not fabricating anything... they are literally using a word wrong and we should not be "well, they meant xyz"

Whether they "don't know" or just "made up a new meaning" is irrelevant

load more comments (6 replies)