Linux

48654 readers

429 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

No web browser offers a good out of the box experience. (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by the_crab_man@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

96 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I feel like there is no web browser with a sane default configuration that I can recommend to other people. All browsers are preconfigured in a way that harms the privacy of their users or include services that no one wants such as Pocket and BAT.

Here are my problems with some popular browsers.

Mozilla Firefox: Pocket integration, no ad-blocking without extensions.
Brave: Everything related to crypto. Also its start page is horrible.
Chromium: No ad-blocking without extensions and soon Manifest v3 will cripple all content blockers.

Now, these suboptimal defaults wouldn't be such a big problem if the configuration files were easy to backup and restore and respected the XDG base directory specification.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TheMadnessKing 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the problem with using uBlock on FF. Gets rids of ads, has ton of features to custom add filters and more.

Also, I kinda like Pocket Integration on FF. Found some interesting articles that way.

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The problem with Pocket is: most of us don't want it, and cannot get rid of it like you do with extension.

[–] jayandp@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well you can just remove the button by right-clicking on it. But if that's not enough, Mozilla has a help page to completely disable it.

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/disable-or-re-enable-pocket-for-firefox

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Disabling it (even "completely") is not the same as removing it. The code is still there. Mozilla don't even provide a method to exclude it when building from source code.

[–] Yoru@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

idk what you want theb, disabling it is pretty much the same as completely removing it. It simply doesn't do anything. Doesn't send data no nothing

[–] TheMadnessKing 1 points 1 year ago

IMO that logic is really absurd. If you can disable it so that it doesn't bother you, nor steal your data, then it's completely fine. They are giving you the option to opt-out.

[–] TheMadnessKing 1 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure there was a flag to disable it.