News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
And no mention anywhere in the article that these kind of errors are symptomatic of LLM generated text.
When is the media going to stop dancing around shit in order to appear unbiased and start doing their job as the Fourth Estate by calling out obvious horseshit?
ETA: Same goes for the original article that the above linked article references. Listing lots of errors that are so ridiculous, that they're either AI/LLM generated, or somebody intentionally inserting errors to make it look like the report was LLM generated.
And yet,even that article dances around the obvious issue without apparently having the simple courage to just say, "These kinds of errors are highly symptomatic of AI/LLM generated text."
Yeah... That horse has left the barn, turned around, struck a match, tossed it inside, and shut the door.
So-called "Fourth Estate" no longer exists; it has been cowed into subservience and/or just willingly spouts pure propaganda.
They bear a preponderance of the blame for why we are where we are in the US today. 🤡 🖕
And this shitty fucking title. "Acknowledges problems". JFC, they can't even say what the problems were.
I would say making statements that the mistakes are suggestive of AI/LLM authorship would be speculative without hard evidence. That said, they should call it what it is, a half-assed report that’s a result of either carelessness or a willful desire to misinform.
I disagree. Saying that the mistakes are LLM generated without evidence to support that claim would certainly be inappropriate.
However, simply stating something like...
is completely factual and highly relevant.