this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
127 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23908 readers
380 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't think it is inconsistent to oppose both copyright and plagiarism.

[–] Inui@hexbear.net 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

We just need a forever expanding attribution list, even if we get rid of copyright.

X was created by Dave, Y was created by Eliza based on work by Dave, Z was created by Joaquin based on work by Dave and Eliza and so on.

Academics already do this when citing sources, just make everyone else do it too.

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Academics already do this when citing sources, just make everyone else do it too.

Academics are supposed to do this when citing sources, now it's more like "here's a paper with a title that looks relevant whose abstract I barely read at the end of this sentence to make it look more authoritative" or "Here's the last paper I wrote on this subject."

[–] MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

5 self-referencing papers deeper, "oh, you actually did take the time to write the methods...10 years ago."

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago

It happens so much! meow-tableflip

[–] Owl@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"What was this based on and how did I change it" is a great start to an alternative to copyright.

"Bee movie but it speeds up every time they say 'bee' " is the gold standard for artistic attribution.

"Bee movie but it speeds up every time they say 'bee' " is the gold standard for artistic attribution.

Me providing citations for my fanfiction like: "Gundam but I made it even gayer."