this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
587 points (98.0% liked)

Games

38762 readers
1317 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

As the graph breaks down, some games are patched by companies to allow them to function offline or to enable self-hosted servers. Mostly its fan efforts to reverse engineer the server code, though.

The point of the stop killing games campaign is to legislate by law that going forward, developers/publishers would have to account for a way to allow the player to host a server or patch the game to run offline when they become unprofitable and are shut down.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

My point was more that games that require the Internet itself, and not just LAN-capable servers, are games that are inevitably going to disappear.

It may seem like I'm splitting hairs but what I said is technically true.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 4 points 16 hours ago

I understand, but I'm not really sure why you're pointing out the exact problem that this campaign is actively trying to solve.