politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I'm an evil government employee and doubly evil since I work for DoD. I'm down with finding fraud, waste, and abuse. The issue is I also think that DOGE needs to sloe it rill a bit and ask why a system is why it is. I'm sure there are efficiencies and they need to be enacted but we need to ask why we use the systems we use. The USG cannot move fast and break things because people aren't companies and don't have the capital to react.
If there are back end process that need to be changed that great change away but to beneficiaries it should be transparent.
If you want to change the military and its procurement spell out the case. If you want to cut personnel let's have a discussion some services like the Army and Marine Corps personnel are the weapon.
If there is to much civilian control of the military let's line item that, which civilians do you want to cut? Then contrast that list with people the military has spent mega dollars to train.
Then there's the cut off, the Army sends hundreds of people to post secondary schools every quarter (I was one of those) is there a value add to cutting Bob who's gone through either NCOES or OES and gone on to be DoD civilians?
On a personal level I enlisted after college with my degree in Philosophy, I went through all the NCO schools, then after commission I've gotten two masters degrees do we really want to cut me loose after my enlisted and officer training schedules.
Do we not want trained people in both the civilian and civilian education system helping to decide the future of the military.
I will admit that my time in uniform beginning 25 years ago does not make me a subject matter expert in modern conflicts the education the Army paid for gives me some perspective on where the Army should go.
I've not been in a peer to peer engagement but I do understand the how and why of modern weapons and can make assumptions about infantry weapons going forward
There are thousands of subject matter experts working as civilians in DoD, they've spent not an insignificant amount of money training us so why discard us
Yes. This is sometimes known as chesterton's fence
https://theknowledge.io/chestertons-fence-explained/