this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
52 points (94.8% liked)

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

2986 readers
131 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Imagine spending hours on the couch, feeling good about the morning’s workout. You ran, you lifted, you stretched. You believe you’ve done enough to protect your health. But new research says that may not be true.

Sitting for extended periods, regardless of exercise, can harm the brain. Even the most active older adults face the risk of faster brain shrinkage if they sit too much.

The study, led by researchers from Vanderbilt University’s Memory and Alzheimer’s Center, tracked older adults for seven years. They examined how long participants sat, how often they moved, and how much their brains shrank over time.

The results were troubling. Exercise didn’t fully counteract the effects of prolonged sitting. The more hours spent sitting, the greater the brain decline.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Peanutbjelly@sopuli.xyz 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why is there nothing about what people were doing with their brains in either state? Is this just correlation? The definition of "sedentary behavior" was even noted as vague in the study. Why are people drawing such strong conclusions? I fucking hate journalism.

[–] redsunrise@programming.dev 8 points 3 days ago

so true. any real journalist would've scrutinized this study, but now all journalists need for an article is a 9 year old tweet from a guy with 4 followers