News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
People with asthma, flat feet, depression, heart murmurs, etc can't join the military. Why should people with gender dysphoria be allowed to join?
People who would never join the military are the ones complaining. And if they do join, they should be limited to non deployable jobs.
Do you even know what the real issue is?
Never said it's similar to asthma, but trans people do have to take hormones for the rest of their lives, and there's a lot of disqualifiers for military service as it is. It's not like joining a health spa. It's not just the lives of trans, it's the lives of everyone in the unit. And I know that combat units won't be able to handle that yet. And you may say that they should, but you can't just throw one in there and expect them to handle it, especially when it's a job that deals with life and death.
You don't understand. You're just a virtue signaler that won't volunteer to join the military.
Do I care? Nope. But i wouldn't have a problem if there's a waiver, and keeps them out of combat arms. Can't take hormones when you're in a long ass firefight or skirmish. Can't stop evading from an enemy threat just so you can administer those meds. Convoys won't risk driving over IEDs just to deliver them.
They'd be better suited for support roles if anything.
Keep being butthurt about stuff you don't understand.
Imagine calling some a "virtue signaler" and then saying the words "Do I care? Nope." Lmao.
So, what's weird to me is that these people seemed to do just fine in the military, and are now being booted for being trans. So, what's the problem? I mean, the obvious flaw is that not all trans people have to take hormones, and this ban targets people who don't take hormones the same as those that do. But even if they did have to take hormones, they were doing fine before, so what's the issue?
It seems silly to me that the military, with record low recruitment, would ban a population that has a far higher degree of joining them due to a lot of really shitty factors.
They were able to join because the military lowered their standards because of the low recruitment numbers lol
Trans people were always joining the military at higher rates, and the reasons why are obvious. They were only able to be openly trans recently, but they have been able to be closeted trans since always. Just like gay people. Don't ask, don't tell, amirite?
When the government literally advertises the military as super masculine, you're gonna get a lot of people that are either really into being ultra masculine and people that feel like they aren't being masculine enough, which are certainly attributes that are likely to fit with people that feel gender dysphoria.
The other reason, of course, is that LGBT people are far more likely to be homeless from being cut off from their friends and family and have few alternatives, and the military is certainly one of the more effective ways to improve your economic situation.
This ain't rocket surgery.