this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
391 points (73.8% liked)

Selfhosted

46638 readers
2042 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iceonfire1@lemmy.world 28 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 11 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Their lifetime is also much shorter. Guess where all that CO2 goes, when they die ^^

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 2 hours ago

Wherever you put it?

[–] pikmeir@lemmy.world 19 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I have a solution. More algae.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 8 hours ago

This is the solution. You drain it and sequester the carbon.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Fake and algae

[–] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 12 hours ago
[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm gonna bet that you're going to get a much-more-economical return there by powdering whatever iron is used in building that thing and then dumping said iron powder into the ocean at an appropriate point.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

This technique is controversial because there is limited understanding of its complete effects on the marine ecosystem,[5] including side effects and possibly large deviations from expected behavior. Such effects potentially include release of nitrogen oxides,[6] and disruption of the ocean's nutrient balance.[1] Controversy remains over the effectiveness of atmospheric CO2 sequestration and ecological effects.

Geoengineering is bullshit proposed by funding from fossil fuel companies so they can continue to pollute.

The solution is simple: make it illegal to pollute. Fine the companies responsible for their past contributions to the climate catastrophe out of existence.