this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
976 points (95.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

10790 readers
2261 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You are being actively obtuse if someone informs you “lots of people are offended by this” and you just plug your ears and go “you don’t speak for them”

They're not necessarily speaking to those people specifically or exclusively. They could be speaking to the broader language community that through their collective action has established that the conventional meaning of the word isn't dehumanizing (because conventionally it isn't) when someone like you comes along & tries to twist their words.

It’s common knowledge.

Your "common knowledge" is mistaken: the language community is the authority on their language & there are wrong answers. Someone informing you "lots of people are offended" isn't a reliable authority, being offended doesn't make someone's opinion correct. The fewer people recognizing some niche, novel reinterpretation don't decide for the rest of the community the conventional definitions of words.

The conventional definition of that word has stood far longer & holds more weight, so people are justified to generally accept it & reject unconventional ones. I think you're aware of that: innocuous instances are common.

Blanket condemnation based on an unconventional meaning of a word punishes nonoffenders instead of actual wrongdoers. The general community would be right to consider such antagonism & the people who defend it unjustified & petty.

asshole

You like this word. Reflect a bit: do good people twist people's words when they understand the usual meaning isn't what they claim? Do good people think it's right to antagonize nonoffenders?

I think good people would try to interpret messages according to their likely meanings & not the worst, unsupported ones.

There's a fair argument here that your understanding of this situation is backward.

You aren’t arguing in good faith here.

That indicates your clouded judgement: you're failing to recognize conventional language isn't just a matter of opinion (no matter how strong).