180
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by simple@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world

TL;DR:

Image showing the release times for Starfield

Image comparing the different editions of Starfield

Minimum Specs:

  • OS: Windows 10 version 21H1 (10.0.19043)
  • Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, Intel Core i7-6800K
  • Memory: 16 GB RAM
  • Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700, NVIDIA GeForce 1070 Ti
  • DirectX: Version 12
  • Storage: 125 GB available space
  • Additional Notes: SSD Required

Recommended Specs:

  • OS: Windows 10/11 with updates
  • Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 3600X, Intel i5-10600K
  • Memory: 16 GB RAM
  • Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
  • DirectX: Version 12
  • Network: Broadband Internet connection
  • Storage: 125 GB available space
  • Additional Notes: SSD Required
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Is it still 30 fps on Series X? I don't think that's acceptable for a first-person game in 2023.

[-] beefcat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You say that, but Immortals of Aveum probably would have benefited immensely from a 30 FPS option.

[-] lustrum@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Even more from a 40FPS option.

[-] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I didn't follow this game. Can you explain why a lower frame rate is desirable here? Is it just too demanding to run at 60+?

[-] lustrum@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

It's 720p on PS5 then upscaled. It runs ok at 60FPS. But the Res is simply too low for me

[-] beefcat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is the first shipping UE5 game that uses both Nanite and Lumen, and with insanely detailed environments to boot. It holds a pretty stable 60 FPS on the PS5, but it runs at 720p internally and upscales to 4k using FSR2, resulting in some very questionable image quality.

I think these features are insanely cool and their commitment to supporting 60 FPS is commendable, but this really is a case where I would actually prefer 30 or 40 FPS with a higher internal resolution.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago

It's not going to get better unless companies start making consoles with 1-2 year life cycles (which won't sell, because at that point, you may as well be swapping parts out of your PC of Theseus).

[-] NuPNuA@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

Why? If the game has been targetted at 30 though development and everything built around that it should be fine.

[-] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

You really believe that? Have you played New Vegas at 30 and 60 fps? Go ahead and try it out. I'll wait.

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
180 points (95.5% liked)

Games

32974 readers
1294 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS