this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
26 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

32 readers
10 users here now

The latest news and developments on Firefox and Mozilla, a global non-profit that strives to promote openness, innovation and opportunity on the web.

You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Related

Rules

While we are not an official Mozilla community, we have adopted the Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines as far as it can be applied to a bin.

Rules

  1. Always be civil and respectful
    Don't be toxic, hostile, or a troll, especially towards Mozilla employees. This includes gratuitous use of profanity.

  2. Don't be a bigot
    No form of bigotry will be tolerated.

  3. Don't post security compromising suggestions
    If you do, include an obvious and clear warning.

  4. Don't post conspiracy theories
    Especially ones about nefarious intentions or funding. If you're concerned: Ask. Please don’t fuel conspiracy thinking here. Don’t try to spread FUD, especially against reliable privacy-enhancing software. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Show credible sources.

  5. Don't accuse others of shilling
    Send honest concerns to the moderators and/or admins, and we will investigate.

  6. Do not remove your help posts after they receive replies
    Half the point of asking questions in a public sub is so that everyone can benefit from the answers—which is impossible if you go deleting everything behind yourself once you've gotten yours.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The CEO of Mozilla, Laura Chambers, provided insights about the U.S. v. Google LLC case ahead of the trial slated to begin April 21, 2025.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Before I read, my guess is it won't be asking for Google to keep Chrome (because of that sweet sweet Google money), but won't be a really anti-Google blog entry. Presumably very wishy-washy.

Now I'll read it and see how off I was.

Lol, she's more concerned about the Google millions they get every year. Pathetic. The blog entry is a wishy-washy as I expected it to be. Maybe even more pro-Google than I expected, but she tread a fine line to not be so obvious about how desperate she is for that million dollar paycheck the search engine deal nets her. Again, it's pathetic.