Anarchism

2331 readers

6 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.

Other anarchist comms

!anarchism@slrpnk.net
!anarchism@lemmy.blahaj.zone
!anarchism@hexbear.net
!anarchism@lemmy.ml
!anarchism101@lemmy.ca
!flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

A common pro-government argument is "How would you protect yourself without a government/the state/the police?" How would you refute this? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] prex@aussie.zone 1 points 4 months ago

PS: The level of actual violence isn't relevant to any of this. A dictator, or a government, that is in full control only need the threat of violence.

permalink
fedilink
source
parent