this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
364 points (98.9% liked)

News

28700 readers
4297 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A generation accustomed to financial challenges is dealing with their recession fears through wry TikToks and by swapping cost-cutting suggestions online.

Millennials are worried they are about to experience a “once-in-a-lifetime” recession. Again.

Dire economic downturns are supposed to be rare, but millennials — defined by the Pew Research Center as those born between 1981 and 1996 — have already had several recessions during formative stages of their lives, from the dot-com bubble burst when most were children, to the Great Recession as they entered the workforce after college, to the Covid-19 pandemic when they were trying to settle into their careers.

Once dubbed the “unluckiest generation,” millennials have postponed major milestones during past recessions. A significant slice of them graduated college between 2007 and 2009 and struggled to find jobs, which led them to delay buying homes, getting married, and making major purchases, such as cars. Then, after the pandemic led to another sharp recession, some millennials, contending with student loans and rising costs of living, decided to rethink having kids.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] b3an@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Millennials were fucked repeatedly by the economy and still are and now other generations. But nah let’s let these boomer assholes just destroy everything and turn the country into a giant trailer park of inbreds.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

This is such an easy problem to solve.

Let them repeal Medicare.

Within a month either half the boomers will be dying, OR, you'll have an army of 5 million boomers charging the white house to gadaffi the orange fuck unless he gives them back their viagra.

Or.Suspend social security, if you want to guarantee the latter.

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Those outcomes are the explicit reasons they HAVEN'T repealed those programs in the past. Gutted them several times over, turned them into money piles for The Rich, yes, but never, EVER actually tried to repeal them. They've campaigned against these programs for DECADES, screaming about how awful they are, how they'll get rid of them and then everyone will be wealthy, for YEARS!!!

But they haven't. As a political scapegoat, they're too damn useful; they consistently get a major voting bloc motivated and just plain angry enough to head to the polls and knowingly, openly vote against their own interests. But more than that, they know that those same people, the ones frothing at the mouth against the immigrant, the queer, and the minority, are the ones who will suffer most should these programs fail, leading them to direct their anger at those who caused it.

And so, the programs persist, for should they actually fail, heads will roll...

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Which is exactly why we should encourage them to grab that third rail with both hands and not let go.

I want to see a president face a real-time, physical referendum on their performance.