33
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by JoBo@feddit.uk to c/science@lemmy.ml

Reasonably speedy retraction this time, six months from when the problems were first noted on PubPeer (https://pubpeer.com/publications/58E5F4120AB02E9565E3B4DE303EC3). Nine years after publication...

Elisabeth Bik is doing an incredible job. Her toot for this retraction: https://med-mastodon.com/@ElisabethBik/110969401224111581

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ravermeister@lemmy.rimkus.it 2 points 1 year ago

First thought was, maybe it was printed with an Xerox printer😃

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
33 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13160 readers
72 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS